Rushkoff’s ability to harbor two seemingly contradictory thoughts at the same time is rather mindblowing, is it not? Somehow we are at once “potentially creative thinkers” (i.e. people he might consider worth listening to while he sits upon his omniscient pedestal which his worhippers have made for him) and yet the title of his piece is Conspiracies of Dunces. He refers to “this drivel”. Somehow, Pilots for 9/11 Truth gets used as an example of what should be eschewed in an article which is ostensibly about “9-11 theorizing”. According to the website pilotsfor911truth.org - “We do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time.” Sounds like drivel to me. But perhaps Rushkoff merely contains Whitmanesque multitudes.
Please visit the site patriotsquestion911.org to view a few of the “potentially creative minds” which Rushkoff dismisses so easily. Perhaps so easily in fact, that non critical thinking readers might never become aware of the following patriotic individuals who dare to question the “official conspiracy theory” as embodied by the Kean/Zelikow commission report
110+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials
220+ Engineers and Architects
50+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals
160+ Professors Question 9/11
190+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members
100+ Entertainment and Media Professionals
Names and email addresses are required (email addresses aren't displayed), url's are optional.
Comments may contain the following xhtml tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>